Future Military Robots Explained

Future Military Robots Explained

Our wars used to be fought on foot, but then
we harnessed horses for battle. Swords were our weapon of choice until guns were invented.
Chariots slowly evolved into tanks, and in less than 100 years this [picture of the wright
bros], turned into this . But the change that’s now
underway will be the most significant in human history, as soldiers from the world’s richest
countries will soon rarely come face to face with their enemies. This is a profile of the
robotic takeover of the world’s militaries. For years now, the military of the United States and our closest allies, the Europeans,
Israel, and South Korea have been using a whole range of robotic systems, like
remotely controlled robots, now commonly used for surveillance and for destroying bombs;
close-in weapons systems onboard virtually every ship in the west’s Navy can destroy
incoming missiles, aircraft and smaller, faster boats all without human assistance;
autonomous Unmanned Ground Vehicles guard areas and attack enemies using lethal and
non-lethal weapons; the MQ Reaper Unmanned Aerial Vehicle is a
long-range killer that’s so effective, America’s 174th Fighter Wing has became the first squadron
in history to convert from flying fighter jets to an all–remotely piloted UAV attack
group; the secretive stealth unmanned RQ-170 drone
that the US lost control of over Iran in 2011; tiny surveillance drones the size of small
birds or insects; a robotic, remote-controlled sentry gun that’s
replacing human guards on the South Korean side of the demilitarized zone and for Israel,
along the Gaza border fence; and the Protector, an unmanned speed boat used by the Singapore
Navy to patrol the busiest port in the world; the Israeli Navy to enforce its blockade of
the Gaza Strip; and the Mexican Navy to confront highly creative drug smugglers. Some have called for a halt in the development
of military robotics technology, but the US, its allies, and key adversaries continue to
make their militaries as technologically advanced as possible because of the massive tactical
advantage it gives them. The Pentagon currently deploys some 11,000 UAVs and 12,000 ground
robots across the world, making America the clear leader. But China has already demonstrated
several prototype systems that may be just as sophisticated as some in the American arsenal.
This is setting off a regional arms race of sorts as Japan, South Korea and Singapore
feel the need to respond with significant investments of their own. The Russians have
begun deploying armed robots to increase security at its ballistic missile bases and may deploy
unmanned airships to monitor its interests in the Arctic. Worldwide, military spending on the robotics
industry is projected to hit $7.5 billion by 2018. But its not just governments doing
the investing. Google has begun buying up robotics companies, positioning itself to
dominate the commercial market, estimated to be worth around $37 billion by 2018. Google
– or another tech company like it – could become the next generation’s dominant defense
contractor. Some of the projects that we know are in development
for military use and should hit the battlefield in the coming years include:
the Knifefish, an underwater minesweeping robot that will replace the Navy’s trained
dolphins and sea lions in 2017; an unmanned autonomous helicopter carrying
a remotely operated sniper rifle; unmanned ground vehicles of the future will
increasingly perform automated surveillance, reconnaissance, assault and breaching missions.
Other UGVs will simply be retrofits of existing humvees and tanks with sensors and cameras;
Boston Dynamics’ humanoid robots – used for search and rescue – and their BigDog robotic
pack mule to accompany soldiers into terrain that’s too difficult for conventional vehicles;
unmanned missile barges will provide extra weapons for existing destroyers;
cruise missiles that are smart and networked to autonomously coordinate and swarm their
attack so as to ensure maximum damage to their target;
a Joint Aerial Layer Network will link all air assets with all other military assets
in a region to provide maximum coordination and efficiency;
high-speed, unmanned fighters and bombers will fly alongside manned aircraft until they
take over the air force completely. They’ll be piloted by soldiers located safely back
on a ship, or on some faraway base; And undetectable underwater pods will be placed
in the ocean weeks, months, or even years ahead of time and eventually given a command
to release unmanned submarines or unmanned aerial vehicles that will float to the surface
and then take to the air. The reason that militaries will turn to robots
to fight its battles is obvious: it’ll keep their soldiers from getting killed and it
will greatly enhance national security and defense capabilities. But, like many problems
posed by our increasingly technological world, removing the human connection to what war
viscerally feels like on the ground, where it’s being fought, will create a whole new
set of challenges. Many of the American pilots now flying drone missions in Iraq and Afghanistan
already do so from places like Arizona, far away from the battlefield, which means they
can bomb a group of people, and then half an hour later be sitting safely at home with
their families. It’s no surprise that this extreme daily contrast is causing these soldiers
to experience high rates of PTSD. Then there’s the idea that by further removing the human
cost of war from the equation, we risk becoming more tolerant of our governments engaging
in armed conflicts. And then there’s the unknown: what happens when two nuclear armed
states engage in a direct, robots-on-robots battle? How does one win that kind of conflict?
And, when does losing one justify starting a war between living, breathing human beings? For better or worse, these are questions we’re
going to learn the answers to in the first half of the 21st century, so we better get
to work creating some agreed-upon international standards before its too late. If you enjoyed this video, hit that like button
or share it to start your own conversation. Click on the screen to watch a TED Talks that
explores some of these challenges, or our newest video, or a video about how robots
are probably going to take almost all of our jobs. You can take our poll: will the rise
of robots in our militaries ultimately be a good or bad thing for mankind? Thanks for watching. For the daily conversation,
I’m Bryce Plank.

100 Replies to “Future Military Robots Explained”

  1. All it will take is a few robots killing civilians instead of military targets, and were back with humans. But by then it might be an all out war 'Human V.S. Machine'.

  2. I'd rather we stick to human on human than robot on robot, and then robot on human. I like knowing my military is full of living, caring, thinking people, and not killing machines at the whim of whatever party is in power

  3. Please dont say "robotic takeover of the worlds militaries". Like Siera Leon or Zimbabwae will ever have robot armies. How about 5 or 6 countries tops.

  4. Keep the content coming, you could potentially be one of my favorites next to this artist named Hunnid.  Check out his videos.. I have a few on my page.

  5. Humanity always creates death until he created his own. His time is finally at hand. The New World Order was always about the AI. IE Sheva "The Destroyer". The arms are connections to other systems. economics, military, education, and governments all hopelessly tied to a system called 5G/Deepmind. Sheeples, we have passed the point of no return and our own destruction.

  6. There are viruses (emphasis on plural) when released, will spread quickly… killing every human exposed within days of initial exposure and you think the future of warfare will be robotic?

    Well, maybe… they'll be the only thing left.

  7. I rewatched terminator the other night. & im totally creeped out about this entire issue. Thumbs up if u agree 👍

  8. В Америке лучшее вооружение в мире обожаю Америка

  9. this is cool and all but dont you think they should focus on a anti-nuke defense system? cus like non of those machines will matter if the enemy country just sends a couple nukes over here..

  10. Robots answer to the controler. Which means while the US invests in Building remote controlled robots, the others will invest in Hijacking Remote Controled systems.

  11. But there's no money for the hungry and poor, wake up people we in the last days this abominable Behavior will not continue forever.

  12. And in one day,come the moment when Sophia,artificial inteligence,control all this weapons,and start to exterminate human kind.

  13. No we cannot stop all missiles that is a lie. the United states missile defense is not as strong as we are made to think.

  14. I have just got to know, where were you educated? please , …….. I am on the 10th level just listening to your presentation…BBC reporters do not have your vocal class … tell me about your background…did you spent time in the Caribbean … and the strange thing is your diction is so perfect as to make any accents disappear ….

  15. I am gonna get worried when they build swarms of shape charged mini flying drones. That is the end all I think for AI killing efficiency, imagine 100,000 mini drones the size of your hand packed with a small shape charge explosive. Pack it with face recognition software it could be used to take out any group of people.

  16. Robots might become a supplement to the solder, but the robot will never replace the solder. Mainly because there is no real way to ensure the enemy will not gain control of your robots.
    Capture of enemy weapons has always been a major factor in every war and combat operation. Robots will not be any different.

  17. 2019 ! ! ! ! 💲💲💲💲💲💲💲💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵👑👑👑👑👑👑👑

  18. What happened to going to the stars. Getting all our toxic nuclear waste that will kill us off this planet lol. Aliens are studying us and placing bets how long we will last. I say it will take 100 years till all the nuclear waste containers rust . Dam.

  19. To be serious I want my child and my family's children to choose if they want to be in the military, honestly think of robots invading the U.S., we would have no defense unless the robots were deployed to us. We should never put out robots as soldiers, I am a warrior, I choose to be not need to be.

  20. Clone Soldiers….
    Bionic Soldiers …..
    Pro type Android Robot Soldier…..
    Then Super Robot Android…….
    Cryo Super Soldiers is also possible…….

    The sad fact…….
    Terrorists, Insurgents & Criminals Technology will also becomes more notorious and nightmare.

  21. The Americians must be very worried that Russia can shut down the EAGIS systems on all Americian Destroyers! 12 attack passes by an SU-24 after shutting down the defence of an american warship while another SU-24 circled above.
    Hows that for sitting ducks.

  22. I think exoskeletons are probably the best choice for militaries. The risk of robotic exoskeletons has much lower risk than robots

  23. Imagine a civilisation that has had technology for one billion years. They put your brain in a super android that can live for thousands of years. The human body is weak and redundant.

  24. Using remote controlled robots won't work against technologically sophisticated enemies, like China, Russia, or other states that have sophisticated jamming technologies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *